you fail to take in the consideration of the weapons are in use.
Japanese record are because the difference of weapons.
if weapons in use are the same, Japanese would get their ass kick like always.
all china war vs Japan pre WWII, China didn't sent more troops then Japan, and they won easily.
even with supreme fire power, Japanese still fail to conquer China say it all.
I am not sure what do you expect to accomplish by this, Japan is not as tough as you think they are, they pretty much can't win any war without using weapons two generations higher.作者: 已被刪除 時間: 2011-4-30 09:02 PM
沒有原子彈,美軍還是能打進入日本本土。作者: lancer0717 時間: 2011-5-1 09:14 AM
沒有原子彈中國還是能贏,前提是美國的武器有持續輸入,
只是會耗更久的時間而已,就算沒有原子彈美國還是有登陸日本作戰的這個選擇作者: tf1487148 時間: 2011-5-1 10:33 AM
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽作者: e7211300 時間: 2011-5-16 01:04 AM
沒有美國的原子彈但美軍還是持續推進日本
所以在有美軍進攻的前提下日本還是會投降
所以應該只是時間上的問題作者: ppbpp 時間: 2011-5-16 03:35 AM
因為殖民者只要生活水準、政治、文化等比被殖民者高
g4xup6eji6vul3 發表於 2011-5-15 11:04 AM
you sound like Japan score very high in those department.
need i remind you, where Japanese culture came from.
this is like i won a Jackpot, and i can hire people to beat you up. that mean i have higher culture? and you'll be 同化 by me?作者: kaoruakito 時間: 2011-5-16 01:05 PM