伊莉討論區

標題: [巴西衛生部長：中國新冠疫苗或于明年2月投入使用][觀察者網][2020-12-17] [打印本頁]

作者: magic_1981 時間: 2020-12-17 03:56 PM 標題: [巴西衛生部長：中國新冠疫苗或于明年2月投入使用][觀察者網][2020-12-17]

【文/觀察者網熊超然】近期，英國、加拿大、美國等多國已在國內啟動新冠疫苗大規模接種工作，而在全球疫情“重災區”之一的巴西，民眾何時能夠接種疫苗始終懸而未決。

據路透社當地時間12月16日報道，巴西衛生部長愛德華多·帕祖洛（Eduardo Pazuello）當天透露，中國科興公司（Sinovac）和英國阿斯利康公司（(AstraZeneca）的兩款新冠疫苗可能將于明年2月中旬在巴西投入使用，不過具体時間仍有待監管部門批准后再作出。

值得注意的是，在巴西國內，不僅總統帶頭違反防疫規定，疫苗問題也被政治“綁架”。隨著疫情的反彈以及疫苗計划始終無進展，國內的恐慌情緒正日益加劇。

路透社報道截圖

報道稱，巴西衛生部長帕祖洛16日當天參加了一場旨在討論新冠疫苗接種計划的會議，會后他表示，明年1月左右，巴西國家衛生監督局（ANVISA）會對正在本國進行試驗的新冠疫苗進行數據分析。

“可能在2月中旬開始，我們可以接受並注冊這些疫苗，以啟動這項（接種）計划。”帕祖洛補充說道。

據報道，巴西政府此前已與英國阿斯利康公司及牛津大學達成協議，將購買他們合作研發的新冠疫苗。同時，巴西聖保羅州已與中國科興公司合作，將采用該公司研發的新冠疫苗“克爾來福”（CoronaVac），首批12万劑疫苗已于11月19日運抵巴西。

路透社的報道還指出，巴西總統雅伊爾·博索納羅（Jair Bolsonaro）此前一直都“政治綁架”中國疫苗，ANVISA在12月14日還發表過一份聲明，污蔑中國衛生部門對于授權新冠疫苗緊急使用的標准“不透明”。

而聖保羅州州長若昂·多利亞（Joao Doria）的態度卻與博索納羅不同，他對中國疫苗表達了充分信任，並稱科興公司的疫苗是“可以幫助拯救數百万巴西人生命的疫苗之一”，即便沒有巴西衛生監管機構的批准，該州仍會使用。

今年7月，聖保羅州州長多利亞在新聞發布會上展示中國疫苗聖保羅州政府圖

值得一提的是，多利亞被外界廣泛視為博索納羅2022年競選連任的主要競爭對手。美媒《福布斯》雜志（Forbes）12月15日就形容道，在巴西這個受新冠疫情打擊最大的國家，疫苗試驗已徹底淪為一場“政治足球游戲”。

就在上個月，ANVISA曾以存在“嚴重不良反應”為由，暫停科興公司新冠疫苗在巴西的臨床試驗。隨后博索納羅宣布，停止中國疫苗試驗是一場“政治勝利”。但隨后的調查卻顯示，死亡志願者系自殺，死因與疫苗無關。兩天后，ANVISA又宣布恢復科興疫苗的臨床試驗。

路透社稱，雖然批評人士指責ANVISA在疫苗問題上越發政治化，但博索納羅卻依舊對該機構負責人大加贊賞。衛生部長帕祖洛也替ANVISA辯護，聲稱該機構的信譽“不應受到質疑”，因為它是“在公共服務領域執行專業技术性工作。”

目前，巴西有超過18万人死于新冠肺炎，該國在這一數據上僅次于美國，排名全球第二。在經歷了一個月左右的數據回落后，新冠病毒近期在巴西再度肆虐，新增病例數和死亡病例數均急劇飆升。

路透社介紹，巴西政府上周以書面的形式制定了一項疫苗接種計划，初步目標是到明年上半年對5100万人進行疫苗接種，約占總人口的四分之一。

該計划顯示，為阻止病毒傳播，巴西70%的人口，即2.12億人中的1.48億人需要進行新冠疫苗接種，而目前的初步目標僅僅涵蓋了這一最終目標的三分之一而已。

作者: zogol 時間: 2020-12-17 05:44 PM

台灣做不出疫苗，就在口罩上自爽就好了ZZZ

作者: maddux4607 時間: 2020-12-17 06:09 PM

好啊想用或敢用就隨他們

作者: is8476 時間: 2020-12-17 09:31 PM

希望那疫苗真的有中國所宣稱的那麼有效

不管是那個國家做的疫苗都好
只要能使新冠病毒不再那麼嚴重

作者: xeno-2007 時間: 2020-12-18 01:03 AM

本帖最後由 xeno-2007 於 2020-12-18 01:14 AM 編輯

Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State Science Adviser Paul Alexander(美國政府衛生及公共服務部的醫學專家) 舉報：

Trump曾計劃在美國本土施行群體免疫，利用瘟疫殘酷淘汰老弱病殘的美國人口
America Great Again

[attach]133916309[/attach]

參考原文： https://www.politico.com/news/20 ... ity-strategy-446408

‘We want them infected’: Trump appointee demanded ‘herd immunity’ strategy, emails reveal

Then-HHS science adviser Paul Alexander called for millions of Americans to be infected as means of fighting Covid-19.

A top Trump appointee repeatedly urged top health officials to adopt a "herd immunity" approach to Covid-19 and allow millions of Americans to be infected by the virus, according to internal emails obtained by a House watchdog and shared with POLITICO.

“There is no other way, we need to establish herd, and it only comes about allowing the non-high risk groups expose themselves to the virus. PERIOD," then-science adviser Paul Alexander wrote on July 4 to his boss, Health and Human Services assistant secretary for public affairs Michael Caputo, and six other senior officials.

"Infants, kids, teens, young people, young adults, middle aged with no conditions etc. have zero to little risk….so we use them to develop herd…we want them infected…" Alexander added.

"It may be that it will be best if we open up and flood the zone and let the kids and young folk get infected" in order to get "natural immunity…natural exposure," Alexander wrote on July 24 to Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Stephen Hahn, Caputo and eight other senior officials. Caputo subsequently asked Alexander to research the idea, according to emails obtained by the House Oversight Committee's select subcommittee on coronavirus.

Alexander also argued that colleges should stay open to allow Covid-19 infections to spread, lamenting in a July 27 email to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield that “we essentially took off the battlefield the most potent weapon we had...younger healthy people, children, teens, young people who we needed to fastly [sic] infect themselves, spread it around, develop immunity, and help stop the spread.”

Alexander was a top deputy of Caputo, who was personally installed by President Donald Trump in April to lead the health department's communications efforts. Officials told POLITICO that they believed that when Alexander made recommendations, he had the backing of the White House.

“It was understood that he spoke for Michael Caputo, who spoke for the White House,” said Kyle McGowan, a Trump appointee who was CDC chief of staff before leaving this summer. “That’s how they wanted it to be perceived.”

Senior Trump officials have repeatedly denied that herd immunity — a concept advocated by some conservatives as a tactic to control Covid-19 by deliberately exposing less vulnerable populations in hopes of re-opening the economy — was under consideration or shaped the White House's approach to the pandemic. “Herd immunity is not the strategy of the U.S. government with regard to coronavirus," HHS Secretary Alex Azar testified in a hearing before the House coronavirus subcommittee on Oct. 2.

In his emails, Alexander also spent months attacking government scientists and pushing to shape official statements to be more favorable to President Donald Trump.

For instance, Alexander acknowledges in a May 30 email that a draft statement from the CDC about how Covid-19 was disproportionately affecting minority populations was "very accurate," but he warned HHS and CDC communications officials that "in this election cycle that is the kind of statement coming from CDC that the media and Democrat [sic] antagonists will use against the president." The problems were "due to decades of democrat neglect," Alexander alleged.

Alexander also appeared to acknowledge that the White House's own push to let states wind down their Covid-19 restrictions was leading to a spike in cases.

"There is a rise in cases due to testing and also simultaneously due to the relaxing of restrictions, less social distancing," Alexander wrote in a July 24 email. "We always knew as you relax and open up, cases will rise."

The emails represent an unusual window on the internal deliberations of the Trump administration, and the tensions between political appointees like Alexander — a part-time professor at a Canadian university — and staff members in health agencies. On Sept. 16, HHS announced that Alexander would be leaving the department, just days after POLITICO first reported on his efforts to shape the CDC's famed Morbidity and Mortality and Weekly Reports and pressure government scientist Anthony Fauci from speaking about the risks of Covid-19 to children.

In a statement, an HHS spokesperson said that Alexander’s demands for herd immunity “absolutely did not” shape department strategy.

“Dr. Paul Alexander previously served as a temporary Senior Policy Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs and is no longer employed at the Department,” the spokesperson said.

Alexander did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Caputo, who took medical leave the same day that Alexander left the department, has referred previous inquiries to HHS.

Public health experts have decried calls to deliberately infect younger, healthier Americans with Covid-19, saying that it would unnecessarily put millions of people at risk of long-term complications and even death. “We certainly are not wanting to wait back and just let people get infected so that you can develop herd immunity. That's certainly not my approach,” Fauci said in September.

Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), who chairs the coronavirus subcommittee, said in a statement that the documents "show a pernicious pattern of political interference by Administration officials."

"As the virus spread through the country, these officials callously wrote, 'who cares' and 'we want them infected,'" Clyburn added. "They privately admitted they ‘always knew’ the President’s policies would cause a ‘rise’ in cases, and they plotted to blame the spread of the virus on career scientists."

Clyburn said that the documents — which the Trump administration only released to his subcommittee after the election, more than two months after his probe began — underscore why HHS must cooperate with his investigation and that CDC Director Redfield must appear for an interview about an email that he allegedly told staff to delete. Otherwise, "I will be forced to start issuing subpoenas," Clyburn said.

The email cache provided a real-time look at the administration’s deliberations as the Covid-19 crisis first began to rebound during the summer.

"So the bottom line is if it is more infectiouness [sic] now, the issue is who cares?" Alexander wrote in a July 3 email to the health department's top communications officials. "If it is causing more cases in young, my word is who cares…as long as we make sensible decisions, and protect the elderely [sic] and nursing homes, we must go on with life….who cares if we test more and get more positive tests."

"How can this be researched and proven true or false?" Caputo asked Alexander in one July 25 email exchange, after Alexander had emailed Hahn and nine top communications officials across HHS and FDA about the value of herd immunity.

Alexander wrote back with data that he said he'd pulled from several studies, including a link to a June 30 Quanta Magazine article about the "tricky math" of herd immunity.

"I did not want to look like a nut ball and if as they think and as I think this may be true ... several hard hit areas may have hit heard [sic] at 20% like NYC," Alexander added. "[T]hat's my argument….why not consider it?"

The health department has worked to distance itself from Alexander since his mid-September departure, and several Trump appointees said that Alexander was often isolated during his roughly six-month stint advising department officials.

“His rants had zero impact on policy and communications,” a senior administration official insisted. “Caputo enabled him to opine, but people pushed back and it even got to a point where Caputo told him to stop sending the emails.”

But McGowan, the former CDC chief of staff, said that Alexander was effective at delaying the famed Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports and watering down guidance that came from his agency.

“He absolutely put pressure on the CDC on different guidance documents, on MMWRs,” McGowan said. “He wanted to change MMWRs that were already posted, which is just outrageous.”

While McGowan said that even though agency officials fended off Alexander’s demands to edit the morbidity and mortality reports, “it’s the type of political meddling that delayed guidance, delayed MMWRs from getting them out as quickly as possible to be effective,” McGowan added.

作者: r8397110 時間: 2020-12-18 02:38 AM

希望不要又有大量疫苗無效
或是疫苗有效率僅20~30趴之類的新聞了
這中共武漢肺炎太恐怖了

歡迎光臨伊莉討論區 (http://a401.file-static.com/)